In this second post, based on Nick Anderson's book, Focusing Change to Win, we highlight contributions from 1072 Business Leaders on The Why and What of Change. The post gives some of the key findings and a sample of useful tips from the book. We take an in-depth look at how our contributors improve their chances of thriving through change, by communicating in ways that build trust and engage people. For these contributors, Communication must constantly focus and connect the What of Change with the Why of Changing.
We take an in-depth look at how our contributors improve their chances of thriving, by communicating in ways that build trust and engage people. For these contributors, communication must constantly focus on:
This is the Change Expectations Framework. It engages deeper understanding and helps everyone manage stress more effectively.
Note: You may think everyone does these three steps. You are probably wrong at least 70% of the time according to studies over the last ten years.
Here’s why it is even more important today:
Most contributors (89%) say that their organizations change at least every 12 months, These changes are driven by 3-4 simultaneous reasons for change. All these changes should have three things in common – what you expect people to:
Yet, our research shows contributors rarely mention all three in the same contribution. Why is this important? Because it creates increased stress and potentially change resistance.
Assuming we are always managing change with limited resources like people, money, technology and time, leaders have to manage the tension between these three elements of stop, start and continue. Then, after deciding the need for change, leaders need the Emotional Intelligence to identify which groups and individuals are likely to experience unhealthy stress and resistance. These findings underscore:
The need for leadership consensus on why are we changing not just what is changing.
For many contributors, leader inconsistency fuels people’s natural resistance. The ever-increasing rate of change demands that leaders give clear and compelling reasons for employees to overcome their feelings of "here we go again." Unfortunately, we conclude that too many leaders either ignore, or are unaware that change will be stressful for their peers and employees.
Contributors readily see the need for change to adapt, survive or improve. The world’s ever-increasing pace demands that leaders give clear and compelling reasons for employees to overcome their feelings of "here we go again." That response begs the question: What can leaders do about this condition?
All those implementing change know in advance, to some extent, that a change will be stressful and that not everyone will be willing to engage. For example, people often work well under certain stress to increase productivity. But, under other circumstances, they are surprised at the stress that another aspect of change can induce. So, stress can be negative, positive or neutral. For example, passing in an examination can be just stressful as failing. The problem occurs when people are under excessive or prolonged stress – Unhealthy Stress. The challenge for change leaders is that stress is unique and personal. A situation may be stressful for someone, but the same situation may be challenging for others.
Action Points: Reducing Employees Stress to Overcome Resistance
To register for a Webinar on this or other topics covered in Focusing Change to Win, please go to http://focusingchangetowin.com/webinar/
Please use the form below to open a dialogue with the author or one of our other consultants